Why put AI on-chain in the first place?
If you’re watching crypto flows in 2025 without AI, you’re basically flying blind. Volumes are up, attackers are smarter, and regulators are done “waiting to see what happens.”
A few numbers to set the stage:
– Chainalysis estimates that illicit crypto volumes hovered around $20–23B annually between 2022 and 2024, but the *share* of illicit activity vs. total volume kept shrinking as overall usage exploded.
– The FBI and EUROPOL both reported year‑over‑year increases of 15–25% in detected crypto‑related fraud cases in 2022–2024, driven largely by scams and cross‑chain laundering.
– Major blockchain analytics platform with ai vendors report that more than half of their enterprise customers now demand real‑time analysis, not daily or hourly batch jobs.
So the task is clear: we need on‑chain AI monitoring that actually keeps up with block times, multi‑chain activity, and fast‑moving attackers.
This tutorial walks you through deploying AI models for on-chain monitoring end‑to‑end: tools, architecture, step‑by‑step deployment, and what to do when things break.
—
What are we actually building?
Think of the target system like this:
1. It listens to on‑chain data (transactions, logs, internal calls).
2. It enriches that data (labels, risk scores, graph features).
3. It runs AI models to flag suspicious behavior in or near real time.
4. It exposes alerts to dashboards, bots, or compliance systems.
You can plug this into a compliance workflow, an internal risk engine, or an open‑source security dashboard. The same foundation works for on-chain ai monitoring solutions focused on DeFi exploits, NFT wash trading, or centralized exchange risk scoring.
—
Necessary tools and building blocks
1. Blockchain data access
Long paragraph:
You can’t monitor anything if you don’t have a reliable data firehose. For Ethereum and EVM chains, you’ll typically use either a hosted node provider (e.g., Alchemy, Infura, QuickNode, or similar services) or run your own full node / archive node. For Bitcoin, you’ll connect via `bitcoind` or a service exposing RPC and indexed data. For high‑throughput L2s or alternative L1s, check whether they offer WebSocket endpoints with `eth_subscribe`‑style streaming. Real‑time monitoring hinges on low latency and predictable throughput, so measure both before you trust a provider.
Short paragraph:
If you’re serious, use WebSockets for live events and a batch pipeline (like BigQuery, Dune, Flipside, or custom ETL) for historical backfills and model training.
2. Data pipeline and storage
You need somewhere to put all those transactions and logs. A typical stack:
– Kafka / Redpanda / NATS for streaming queues.
– PostgreSQL (with Timescale or similar), ClickHouse, or ElasticSearch for querying.
– Parquet files on S3/minio or BigQuery for training datasets.
Over 2022–2024, most mid‑size teams moved away from raw SQL‑only setups toward hybrid streaming + analytics storage. This isn’t hype; it’s because training and deploying machine learning models for crypto transaction monitoring needs both historical breadth and live freshness.
3. AI / ML framework
You don’t need exotic tools. Use what you and your team already know:
– PyTorch or TensorFlow/Keras for deep models.
– Scikit‑learn, XGBoost, LightGBM for tree‑based models.
– Optional: graph libraries (PyTorch Geometric, DGL) for address‑graph models.
In 2022–2024, most production fraud systems in fintech still leaned heavily on gradient boosted trees + well‑engineered features. Deep models and graph neural nets show strong results in research and in some real-time on-chain fraud detection software, but they require more careful deployment and monitoring.
4. Serving and orchestration
At inference time you’ll need:
– A model server (FastAPI, Flask, BentoML, or similar).
– Containerization (Docker) and orchestration (Kubernetes, ECS, Nomad, or serverless).
– A feature store or consistent feature computation layer so training and serving see the same inputs.
For low‑latency use cases, avoid re‑computing heavy graph features synchronously. Pre‑compute in the pipeline and pass lightweight data to the model service.
5. Monitoring and observability
You’re building monitoring for the blockchain, but you also must monitor the monitors:
– Metrics: Prometheus + Grafana or commercial APM.
– Logs: Loki, Elastic, or a cloud logging service.
– Model health: drift detection, alert quality metrics, label lag tracking.
Between 2022 and 2024, several large exchanges reported that model performance degraded by 20–40% over 6–12 months if left untouched, mainly due to new obfuscation tactics and chain‑hopping. You want to catch that early.
—
Step‑by‑step: from zero to working on-chain AI monitor
Step 1. Pin down your scope and success metrics
Don’t “monitor everything.” Start with a crisp problem:
– “Detect likely scam inflows to our hot wallet.”
– “Identify mixers and cross‑chain laundering paths touching our users.”
– “Flag new smart contracts interacting with our protocol that look similar to known exploit contracts.”
Define 3–5 key metrics:
1. Precision / false positive rate.
2. Recall / coverage of known bad cases.
3. Average detection delay (blocks or seconds after transaction).
4. Alert volume per day per analyst (to keep it manageable).
With regulators tightening rules and ai powered blockchain compliance tools entering even mid‑tier markets since 2022, you’ll likely also track SAR (suspicious activity report) quality, or internal “case closure” quality scores.
Step 2. Collect and label historical data
Long paragraph:
To train anything useful, you need a labeled dataset. Pull at least 6–12 months of chain data relevant to your scope. Merge this with known bad addresses (sanctions lists, scam lists, internal blacklists), plus internal incident reports and investigations. Label at the entity or transaction level: `fraudulent`, `suspicious`, `benign`, or more granular categories if you have them (e.g., `scam`, `mixer`, `exploit`, `phishing`). Don’t forget negative examples: high‑volume but legitimate activity like exchange hot wallets, DeFi protocols, or market makers, or your model will scream at every big transfer.
Short paragraph:
Aim for at least tens of thousands of labeled examples. If you don’t have them, start with rules and heuristics, generate weak labels, and refine with human review.
Step 3. Engineer features that matter on-chain
Feature engineering is where domain knowledge about crypto really pays off. Useful ideas:
1. Address‑level features
– Age of the address (first seen block).
– In/out degree, total volume, asset diversity.
– Centrality in the address graph (PageRank, betweenness).
– Share of volume to/from high‑risk clusters.
2. Transaction‑level features
– Amount normalized by chain and asset.
– Time since previous activity by sender/receiver.
– Path length in a short time window (e.g., depth of hops from a known bad origin).
– Use of privacy tools, bridges, or mixers.
3. Behavioral features over windows
– Rapid chain‑hopping or bridge usage.
– “Peel chain” patterns (repeated small splits of a large balance).
– Reused memo fields, similar calldata patterns in scams.
Many on-chain ai monitoring solutions also attach off‑chain signals: KYC risk tiers, device fingerprints, IP geolocation, or prior support tickets. Only add what you actually have and are allowed to use under your jurisdiction’s privacy rules.
Step 4. Train and evaluate your model
Now you’re ready to train. A pragmatic starting stack:
– Use XGBoost or LightGBM on your engineered features.
– Train with class‑weighted loss to handle imbalance (fraud is rare).
– Use time‑based splits: train on older data, validate on newer slices (2022–2023), test on the most recent 3–6 months (late 2023–2024) to capture temporal drift.
Watch for:
– Precision / recall trade‑off at different thresholds.
– Stability across chains or asset types.
– Performance on “novel” fraud types (if you have them tagged).
Between 2022 and 2024, many teams observed that models trained on 2021–2022 DeFi exploits failed badly on 2023–2024 bridge‑centric attacks until retrained with newer patterns. So bake in the expectation that you’ll periodically retrain.
Step 5. Set up real‑time ingestion and feature computation
Your model is only as real‑time as the slowest piece of your pipeline.
1. Subscribe to new blocks / mempool
– For EVM: WebSocket `newHeads` + `logs` subscriptions, or a dedicated transaction stream.
– For other chains: equivalent gRPC/WebSocket or a streaming API.
2. Transform raw events into your feature schema
– Keep a lightweight stateless consumer that writes raw events to Kafka or another queue.
– Downstream, run stream processors (Flink, Spark Structured Streaming, ksqlDB, or just a Python consumer) that:
– Join with address metadata.
– Update rolling stats (e.g., last N transactions, last 24h volume).
– Emit feature vectors keyed by transaction hash or address.
3. Store features in a low‑latency store
– Redis, DynamoDB, or a local cache if your serving stack is simple.
– The important part: model server can fetch the full feature vector in a few milliseconds.
Short paragraph:
Measure end‑to‑end delay from block mined to “features ready.” A practical target is under 5–10 seconds for active compliance, and near block time for exploit alerting.
Step 6. Deploy your model service
Containerize your model:
– Package model weights and feature schema with a FastAPI app.
– Expose a `/score` endpoint that accepts a transaction or address ID and returns a risk score + explanation (top contributing features, if you support that).
– Add input validation and schema checks to avoid silent feature mismatches.
Run it in Docker, then in Kubernetes or your orchestration of choice. Configure autoscaling based on QPS (queries per second). For many teams in 2022–2024, a single modest instance handled thousands of inferences per second for gradient‑boosted models; deep graph models may need GPU support or aggressive batching.
Step 7. Wire alerts into people and processes
A model that nobody listens to isn’t helping. Build:
1. Alert routing
– Send high‑severity alerts to Slack/Teams, PagerDuty, or an incident channel.
– Push lower‑severity items into an analyst queue in your case management system.
2. Analyst tools
– A web UI showing transaction context, address history, and model explanation.
– Quick actions: mark “confirmed fraud,” “benign,” or “needs follow‑up.”
3. Feedback loop
– Feed analyst decisions back into your training set weekly or monthly.
– Track how often alerts lead to real issues vs noise.
With a proper closed loop, some organizations saw 10–20% improvement in precision between 2022 and 2024 without changing the underlying model architecture—just by improving data and label quality.
—
Troubleshooting: when your on-chain AI stack misbehaves
Problem 1. Too many false positives
Symptoms: analysts are overwhelmed, or downstream systems trigger constant alarms.
What to check:
1. Thresholds
– You might be using a development‑time threshold (e.g., 0.3) in production. Raise it incrementally and monitor case outcomes.
2. Feature leakage / bias
– Features like “is large tx” can over‑flag big but legitimate institutional flows.
– Compare feature distributions for false positives vs true positives; remove overly simplistic but high‑weight features.
3. Poor negative examples
– If your training data under‑represents “noisy but benign” activity (e.g., bots, MEV, arbitrage), the model will treat them as anomalies. Add them to your negative class.
Short paragraph:
In 2023–2024, several exchanges reduced false positives by ~30% simply by adding labeled MEV/arbitrage data to their training sets.
Problem 2. Missed obvious fraud (false negatives)
If major scams or sanctioned addresses slip through:
– Confirm that new sanctions / blacklist data are actually wired into your features.
– Add a hard‑rule layer on top of the model for critical “no‑brainer” cases (e.g., direct interaction with a sanctioned wallet).
– Retrain with recent fraud cases. Attackers constantly tweak their paths; your model must see those new patterns.
For real-time on-chain fraud detection software, a hybrid rules + ML system works best: rules catch the predictable stuff; the model handles fuzzy behavioral anomalies.
Problem 3. Latency spikes and dropped transactions
If alerts arrive minutes late:
1. Check node provider latency and WebSocket stability. Switch to a backup if you see chronic delays.
2. Profile stream processors: avoid heavy joins and recomputations per event; use incremental aggregates.
3. Ensure your model server isn’t blocking on slow external calls (e.g., database lookups without caching).
Short paragraph:
Setting strict SLOs—like “95% of transactions scored within 10 seconds”—helps you catch regressions early.
Problem 4. Model drift over months
Fraud patterns in 2025 won’t look like those in 2022. To keep up:
– Track population drift: compare feature distributions monthly vs training baseline.
– Maintain a small manually reviewed sample of alerts and non‑alerts; watch their outcome stats.
– Schedule retraining every 3–6 months, or sooner if you see sharp drops in precision/recall.
From 2022 to 2024, teams that retrained quarterly kept performance within ~5–10% of their initial baseline, while teams that waited a year or more often saw 30%+ performance loss before noticing.
—
Scaling up and going multi‑chain
Once your first chain is stable, you’ll probably want coverage across L1 + L2 ecosystems.
– Normalize features across chains (e.g., USD‑denominated amounts, standardized activity windows).
– Either train chain‑specific models or a single multi‑chain model with a “chain ID” feature.
– Mind data quality differences: some chains have better labeling and attribution than others, which can skew performance.
By 2024, most serious blockchain analytics platform with ai offerings supported at least 5–10 major chains, with custom models for privacy‑oriented networks and bridge‑heavy ecosystems. Copy that playbook: start with the chain that matters most to your risk, then expand gradually.
—
Putting it all together
To recap, the practical workflow for deploying machine learning models for crypto transaction monitoring looks like this:
1. Define a narrow risk problem and clear success metrics.
2. Collect and label historical on‑chain and, if available, off‑chain data.
3. Engineer behaviorally meaningful features at address, transaction, and window levels.
4. Train, validate, and stress‑test models on recent data slices.
5. Build a real‑time ingestion and feature pipeline with strict latency targets.
6. Deploy a robust model serving layer with observability baked in.
7. Integrate alerts into operational processes and create a strong human feedback loop.
8. Continuously monitor drift and retrain to reflect the latest attacker tactics.
Over the last three years, we’ve seen AI move from “nice‑to‑have” to mandatory infrastructure in crypto risk and compliance. If you follow the steps above, you’ll have a solid, production‑grade foundation that can grow from a simple monitor into a full‑fledged, AI‑enhanced risk engine for your organization.